Playoff PAC's blog features only thoughtful, quality work that helps advance the public dialogue on college football reform. We cover current events, spotlight pro-reform articles around the Internet, and provide original content about the BCS's failures and the path to reform.  We will resume regular posts in mid-August 2010.

[Photo by Donald Miralle/Getty Images. Pictured teams and players are not affiliated with Playoff PAC.]


09.02.10 Playoff PAC Releases New Ad, "It's Fixed"
Press Release
09.01.10 Set in Stone Before the First Snap: Empirical Analysis Proves that Pre-Season Reputation Is Prerequisite to BCS Berths
The BCS likes to say that “at the beginning of the season, every bowl subdivision team starts out with an equal chance to become national champion.” However, an empirical analysis of BCS berths undermines this position: history proves that any team not at the very top of the preseason ranking has virtually no chance to go to the BCS Title Game.
08.30.10 Recap of the Off-Season
Before the 2010 season officially kicks off and brings its own new happenings, we here at Playoff PAC thought a look back at 2010’s off-season months would be worthwhile.
07.19.10 PlayoffPAC Statement on Ariz. Sec. of State's Request for Criminal Probe of Fiesta Bowl
06.09.10 Federal Trade Commission, Justice Dept. Discuss the BCS
The nation’s chief antitrust regulators will not hold the BCS to a lower standard because it is centered on a game.
05.28.10 Non-AQs Get Less Because They Prefer It That Way?
The funding disparity has nothing to do with non-AQs voluntarily bargaining away their share. The BCS just gives non-AQs less money without justification—it’s that simple.
05.25.10 Supreme Court Strengthens Antitrust Case against the BCS
An opposite ruling from the High Court today in the American Needle case could have granted the BCS a wholesale exemption from the Sherman Act.
04.29.10 Matching the Top Two Teams?
The BCS repeatedly boasts that it “has delivered a match-up between the two top teams every year.” This claim should be viewed with some skepticism.
04.22.10 Hatch-Baucus Letter Leads to New BCS Disclosure
The BCS’s latest disclosure is hopefully just the start. Playoff PAC expects that further pressure from high places will cause the BCS to disclose even more about its opaque operation.
04.15.10 The Beebe Rule: Watering-Down Eligibility Standards
"Winning" is no longer necessary for bowl berths. "Deserving" is enough under new NCAA rules.
 


Blog Archive

09.02.2010 Playoff PAC Releases New Ad, "It's Fixed"
 
09.01.2010 Set in Stone Before the First Snap: Empirical Analysis Proves that Pre-Season Reputation Is Prerequisite to BCS Berths
 
08.30.2010 Recap of the Off-Season
 
07.19.2010 PlayoffPAC Statement on Ariz. Sec. of State's Request for Criminal Probe of Fiesta Bowl
 
06.09.2010 Federal Trade Commission, Justice Dept. Discuss the BCS
 
05.28.2010 Non-AQs Get Less Because They Prefer It That Way?
 
05.25.2010 Supreme Court Strengthens Antitrust Case against the BCS
 
04.29.2010 Matching the Top Two Teams?
 
04.22.2010 Hatch-Baucus Letter Leads to New BCS Disclosure
 
04.15.2010 The Beebe Rule: Watering-Down Eligibility Standards
 
04.08.2010 The Conservative Case for College Football Reform
 
04.01.2010 Excluding a "Bubble Team" is Better than Arbitrarily Picking a Champion
 
03.25.2010 The BCS and Admission Applications
 
03.18.2010 The BCS's Bogus NCAA Basketball Claims
 
03.14.2010 Download Your BCS Tournament Bracket Today!
 
03.12.2010 Why is the Hatch-Baucus Letter Important?
 
03.04.2010 Not Much to Love about the BCS Mystery
 
02.25.2010 Would Playoffs Really Conflict with Exams?
 
02.18.2010 BCS Enlisted Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. to Lobby
 
02.11.2010 Guest Blog: "Super Conference Proposal"
 
02.04.2010 BCS's NFL Comparisons are Off-Base
 
01.26.2010 The $24 Million Spin Job
 
01.19.2010 Playoff PAC--Year in Review
 
01.04.2010 The "Separate But Equal Bowl"
 
01.01.2010 BCS: Alabama No. 1 Because “Major” Doesn’t Mean “Major”
 
12.30.2009 Debunking "Bracket Creep"
 
12.23.2009 A Few Thoughts in Reply to Washington Times Editorial Board
 
12.16.2009 A Reply to Mr. Cowlishaw
 
12.11.2009 FAQs on Barton's BCS Bill
 
12.09.2009 Welcome to the Club, Please Use the Back Door
 
12.04.2009 Congress Has Important Tasks, But Reform is Still Worthy Pursuit
 
12.02.2009 Rehashing the Dan Patrick-Bill Hancock Interview
 
11.27.2009 Left Out: 2004 and 2008 Utah Utes
 
11.25.2009 Big 12 Commissioner's Bowl Plan is Troublesome
 
11.24.2009 This Week in College Football Reform
 
11.20.2009 New BCS Social Networking Sites--Greatest Hits
 
11.18.2009 Rebutting the BCS: The Old Bowl System as Scare Tactic and Putative Measuring Stick
 
11.13.2009 More on "Motherhood"
 
11.13.2009 In the BCS, It Pays to Lose
 
11.11.2009 BSU's PR Ploy is a Symptom of a Sick System
 
11.06.2009 U.S. Senate Hearing Held BCS’s Feet to the Fire
 
11.04.2009 How the BCS Hurts Gymnasts
 
10.30.2009 Denied Their Day in Court
 
10.29.2009 Playoff PAC Pens Letter to ESPN Regarding Unbalanced Coverage
 
10.28.2009 Guest Blog: The Bowl Playoff Championship Series Proposal
 
10.23.2009 Playoff PAC Blog Exclusive--Utah AG Explains Decision to Sue BCS
 
10.21.2009 Playoff PAC Response to USA Today Columnist
 
10.16.2009 Spotlight on the Championship Fairness Act of 2009
 
10.14.2009 Left Out: 2008 Texas Longhorns
 
10.09.2009 NCAA Bowl Finance: Something Changed in 1995
 
10.07.2009 The BCS--Illegal Procedure?
 
10.02.2009 Spotlight on House Resolution 68
 
09.30.2009 Spotlight on the College Football Playoff Act
 
09.25.2009 Left Out: 2008 USC Trojans
 
09.23.2009 Rebutting the BCS--Academics Schmacademics
 
09.18.2009 The BCS Lobbying Operation
 
09.17.2009 The BCS--A Performance Review
 
09.12.2009 Welcome to the Blog
 
info@playoffpac.com

Copyright © 2009

Paid for by Playoff PAC
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee
www.PlayoffPAC.com