Our Purpose
Contact Us
News & Key Documents
What's Wrong with the BCS?
What Should Goverment Do?
How Will Playoff PAC Help?
Playoff PAC's blog features only thoughtful, quality work that helps advance the public dialogue on college football reform. We cover current events, spotlight pro-reform articles around the Internet, and provide original content about the BCS's failures and the path to reform. We will resume regular posts in mid-August 2010.
[Photo by Donald Miralle/Getty Images. Pictured teams and players are not affiliated with Playoff PAC.]
09.02.10
Playoff PAC Releases New Ad, "It's Fixed"
Press Release
09.01.10
Set in Stone Before the First Snap: Empirical Analysis Proves that Pre-Season Reputation Is Prerequisite to BCS Berths
The BCS likes to say that “at the beginning of the season, every bowl subdivision team starts out with an equal chance to become national champion.” However, an empirical analysis of BCS berths undermines this position: history proves that any team not at the very top of the preseason ranking has virtually no chance to go to the BCS Title Game.
08.30.10
Recap of the Off-Season
Before the 2010 season officially kicks off and brings its own new happenings, we here at Playoff PAC thought a look back at 2010’s off-season months would be worthwhile.
07.19.10
PlayoffPAC Statement on Ariz. Sec. of State's Request for Criminal Probe of Fiesta Bowl
06.09.10
Federal Trade Commission, Justice Dept. Discuss the BCS
The nation’s chief antitrust regulators will not hold the BCS to a lower standard because it is centered on a game.
05.28.10
Non-AQs Get Less Because They Prefer It That Way?
The funding disparity has nothing to do with non-AQs voluntarily bargaining away their share. The BCS just gives non-AQs less money without justification—it’s that simple.
05.25.10
Supreme Court Strengthens Antitrust Case against the BCS
An opposite ruling from the High Court today in the American Needle case could have granted the BCS a wholesale exemption from the Sherman Act.
04.29.10
Matching the Top Two Teams?
The BCS repeatedly boasts that it “has delivered a match-up between the two top teams every year.” This claim should be viewed with some skepticism.
04.22.10
Hatch-Baucus Letter Leads to New BCS Disclosure
The BCS’s latest disclosure is hopefully just the start. Playoff PAC expects that further pressure from high places will cause the BCS to disclose even more about its opaque operation.
04.15.10
The Beebe Rule: Watering-Down Eligibility Standards
"Winning" is no longer necessary for bowl berths. "Deserving" is enough under new NCAA rules.
Blog Archive
09.02.2010
Playoff PAC Releases New Ad, "It's Fixed"
09.01.2010
Set in Stone Before the First Snap: Empirical Analysis Proves that Pre-Season Reputation Is Prerequisite to BCS Berths
08.30.2010
Recap of the Off-Season
07.19.2010
PlayoffPAC Statement on Ariz. Sec. of State's Request for Criminal Probe of Fiesta Bowl
06.09.2010
Federal Trade Commission, Justice Dept. Discuss the BCS
05.28.2010
Non-AQs Get Less Because They Prefer It That Way?
05.25.2010
Supreme Court Strengthens Antitrust Case against the BCS
04.29.2010
Matching the Top Two Teams?
04.22.2010
Hatch-Baucus Letter Leads to New BCS Disclosure
04.15.2010
The Beebe Rule: Watering-Down Eligibility Standards
04.08.2010
The Conservative Case for College Football Reform
04.01.2010
Excluding a "Bubble Team" is Better than Arbitrarily Picking a Champion
03.25.2010
The BCS and Admission Applications
03.18.2010
The BCS's Bogus NCAA Basketball Claims
03.14.2010
Download Your BCS Tournament Bracket Today!
03.12.2010
Why is the Hatch-Baucus Letter Important?
03.04.2010
Not Much to Love about the BCS Mystery
02.25.2010
Would Playoffs Really Conflict with Exams?
02.18.2010
BCS Enlisted Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. to Lobby
02.11.2010
Guest Blog: "Super Conference Proposal"
02.04.2010
BCS's NFL Comparisons are Off-Base
01.26.2010
The $24 Million Spin Job
01.19.2010
Playoff PAC--Year in Review
01.04.2010
The "Separate But Equal Bowl"
01.01.2010
BCS: Alabama No. 1 Because “Major” Doesn’t Mean “Major”
12.30.2009
Debunking "Bracket Creep"
12.23.2009
A Few Thoughts in Reply to Washington Times Editorial Board
12.16.2009
A Reply to Mr. Cowlishaw
12.11.2009
FAQs on Barton's BCS Bill
12.09.2009
Welcome to the Club, Please Use the Back Door
12.04.2009
Congress Has Important Tasks, But Reform is Still Worthy Pursuit
12.02.2009
Rehashing the Dan Patrick-Bill Hancock Interview
11.27.2009
Left Out: 2004 and 2008 Utah Utes
11.25.2009
Big 12 Commissioner's Bowl Plan is Troublesome
11.24.2009
This Week in College Football Reform
11.20.2009
New BCS Social Networking Sites--Greatest Hits
11.18.2009
Rebutting the BCS: The Old Bowl System as Scare Tactic and Putative Measuring Stick
11.13.2009
More on "Motherhood"
11.13.2009
In the BCS, It Pays to Lose
11.11.2009
BSU's PR Ploy is a Symptom of a Sick System
11.06.2009
U.S. Senate Hearing Held BCS’s Feet to the Fire
11.04.2009
How the BCS Hurts Gymnasts
10.30.2009
Denied Their Day in Court
10.29.2009
Playoff PAC Pens Letter to ESPN Regarding Unbalanced Coverage
10.28.2009
Guest Blog: The Bowl Playoff Championship Series Proposal
10.23.2009
Playoff PAC Blog Exclusive--Utah AG Explains Decision to Sue BCS
10.21.2009
Playoff PAC Response to USA Today Columnist
10.16.2009
Spotlight on the Championship Fairness Act of 2009
10.14.2009
Left Out: 2008 Texas Longhorns
10.09.2009
NCAA Bowl Finance: Something Changed in 1995
10.07.2009
The BCS--Illegal Procedure?
10.02.2009
Spotlight on House Resolution 68
09.30.2009
Spotlight on the College Football Playoff Act
09.25.2009
Left Out: 2008 USC Trojans
09.23.2009
Rebutting the BCS--Academics Schmacademics
09.18.2009
The BCS Lobbying Operation
09.17.2009
The BCS--A Performance Review
09.12.2009
Welcome to the Blog
info@playoffpac.com
Copyright © 2009
Paid for by Playoff PAC
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee
www.PlayoffPAC.com